Elephant hawkmoth, Deilephila elpenor |
What questions are those? Well, here is the background in a nutshell :
"Natural history collections are under threat but are vital for taxonomic research, environmental monitoring and education.
The number of specialist curators is declining, so should collections be redistributed to centres of excellence or are there other solutions for orphaned collections?"
The main question that is raised by this is- How do we prevent the loss of these collections? and it is one that is very much on the minds of all natural history curators at the moment as we hear of more collections being 'moth-balled' (put away into storage) and the loss of curators through redundancies or down-sizing, leaving many collections without people to care for them, interpret them or make them available for research.
The biggest threat of course, comes to the collections themselves which may become damaged or lost altogether through poor storage and lack of care. For example, any item with fur, feather or chitin (e.g. taxidermy mounts or insect specimens) are open to attack from a host of pests including the one most reviled by curators, Anthrenus, which whilst being a rather pretty little beetle, views an insect collection as an assemblage of tasty snacks.
The Varigated Carpet Beetle, Anthrenus verbasci (Linnaeus, 1767). |
In a round up of the problems associated with deciding the future of these collections, Darren Mann pointed out that despite their huge popularity with the general public there has been a movement in the museums sector away from natural history and towards the arts and social sciences. To put some perspective on this, the Ashmolean Museum recently spent £7.83 million on Edouard Manet’s
Portrait
of
Mademoiselle Claus. For the same amount of money the entire UK entomological collections* of over 10 million specimens could have been re-housed and systematically arranged in modern pest proof storage.
The Museums Association will be holding a 'Vox Pop' later this week to try and gain some insight into this situation. See the Museums Journal on-line for more information.
See here for a wider view on museum closures across the sector.
*Outside of National and University Museums.
It is disgusting that the Billionaires of the world will still shell out an (affordable) fortune for a dusty old painting in order to show how cultured they are (or to ameliorate the guilt that they feel for having exploited the rest of the world through arms dealing or social and economic fragmentation and environmental 'rape' in the name of the markets) but will not fund the essential care of the collections that underpin our understanding of life on earth. Society needs a shift in morality where philanthropy is not merely a reflection of what is wrong with society (e.g. conspicuous consumption) but an attempt to be part of the solution to fixing environmental problems (e.g. funding the curation of valuable environmental data).
ReplyDeleteYours
Titanus